Today, with the rapid development of mobile Internet, the performance experience of App almost directly determines the user retention rate. Due to the relatively concentrated number of device models on the iOS platform, optimization may seem less difficult on the surface, but as business complexity increases, performance issues continue to emerge: lagging, fast power consumption, network latency, crashes
If the development team only locates and solves problems after they arise, it is often too late. Therefore, establishing a continuous performance monitoring system and coordinating different tools at each stage is the core means to enhance user experience.
In a complete app lifecycle, performance monitoring can be roughly divided into three core stages
Different stages require different tools to build complementary performance monitoring chains.
The most common problem for R&D personnel is the performance overhead caused by code efficiency and logical implementation.
At this stage, the selection of tools should lean towards in-depth analysis and immediate feedback.
Even if the code has been optimized well during the development phase, it still cannot cover the differences in different models, network environments, and user behavior patterns. The responsibility of the testing team is to conduct stress and stability verification in multidimensional scenarios.
After the application goes online, the focus of performance optimization shifts to real user usage. At this stage, developers can no longer rely on local debugging and need to continuously collect and analyze online performance data.
A certain news application received user feedback during its initial launch: slow startup speed and long homepage loading time. The team has adopted the following optimization process:
1、R&D phase
Using Instruments' Time Profiler to locate the issue, it was found that the JSON parsing and image decoding during the cold start phase were too time-consuming.
2、testing phase
By comparing the startup time on multiple devices with Kemo, it was found that low-end models take more than twice as long as high-end models.
Further verification in Charles' weak network environment confirmed that network latency exacerbated startup lag.
3、Operation and maintenance phase
After going online, monitoring data through Firebase revealed that the optimized new version reduced the average startup time by 40%.
Based on Kemo's energy consumption records, it has been confirmed that battery consumption has decreased and user retention rate has increased.
This case demonstrates that only by relying on a combination of multi-stage and multi tool monitoring can we truly establish a closed loop and solve performance issues in user experience.
IOS performance monitoring is not a task that can be independently completed by a single tool, but a continuous process involving development, testing, and operations.
Developers use Instruments and Sanitizers to optimize code at the source.
The testing team used tools such as Kemo and Charles to verify performance stability from the perspectives of real machines and scenarios.
The operations team relies on platforms such as Firebase and Crashlytics to collect real user data and continuously iterate.
Only by connecting these tools and processes can a complete iOS performance monitoring system be built to help the team stand undefeated in the fiercely competitive market.








